"An instant, visual color change. One card visually changes into another with a smooth flourish. A simple and effective color change done with finesse. See details here.
This must be a variation where the changed card ends in differnet places. I don't want to say too much, but the changee card does not end in the same spot as in Click.
Gustav
The click change has a different grip and so does the snap change. The 'move' is even done with different fingers...
Give him a break. No, it isn't mindblowingly original, but it is still pretty sweet looking.
5/5 from me Daniel.
-PTG
I fail to see how this is better than the click change. It's great to know that the card ends on the bottom, but it's a pretty obvious and unoriginal change if you ask me.
I fail to see how telling people to not waste their money is helping. It is obviously a little differnt of a hold on the deck and let's be honest, everyone has different methods of doing things that they like better. I for one, like to try and have a variety of differentmethods of changing the cards so why not have one more? Thanks D.
Because they are charging 5 dollars for a slight variation on a very well known move... I think that most peoples issue with it, not that Madison shouldn't be teaching this variation because its similar to the click change or Marlo's original, but because such a slight variation really shouldn't cost 5 dollars.
^Exactly, the snap change is great, and you do want a clean up. Personally I think I'll prefer this to the click change, it's about personal preference.
Cool release, wonder what else will be coming from DM...
The handling is entirely different. The flourish spin is entirely different. And the end position is entirely different. Therefore, this is just as original a change as the Click Change. To each his own, but there is no "scamming" - just a pretty slick move.
Thank God that JB is here to defend every single artist on his website.
Seriously.
I'm going to agree with Ampersan. Just because he adds a flourishy new move to reveal the initial card and just because the card ends on the BOTTOM (GASP! WHAT AN ADVANTAGE THAT MUST BE!) does not mean that its a different move. the CHANGE itself is exactly. . .
EXACTLY
the same.
\
cheers,
seth
Your right Jonathan, but why make a much more awkard and different variation?
Dai Vernon always makes a good point about trying to make it look as natural as possible and if you're the spectator you should ask yourself ," Why did he do that? Why did he make it spin off the bottom?"
The snap change is just more natural and much more appealing for a card magician. The click change made it one handed with an instant clean-up.
Essentially, most all magicians know how to do a snap change so your essentially just buying a twirl.
But that's just my opnion.
It looks fluid and more natural. Trying to look at it like a laymen, it kinda looks like it just comes out of nowhere. Like, "Ooo look at the way it spins... wait, what?". Maybe that's just me though.
I think d+M did good with it. I give him props (no, not the cards lol)
You know I like the whole thing, from the handling(spin) and the actual change; but for a variation of something that's been out for awhile maybe it should only cost 2.95. All in all great thinking. Because c'mon how many different variations could you come up with for one move. Especially with a decent clean up. D+M= equals I won't but this but appreciate the cleverness.
Why does anyone have to defend it? Some of the people on this forum just don't make sense. Either its people complaining about a trick in the 1 on 1 or they are complaining that Theory11 didnt post a 1 on 1 this week. Its a nice move, either you like D&D's version better or Madison's (or make up your own version) it makes no difference. You don't like it don't buy it. But let everyone else make their own decisions on that.
::HS::
36 Comments
IIAnnexII
3 years agoMagicSanj
3 years agoj.bayme
3 years agoTheBlack&WhiteIllusionist
3 years agoPeterMcKinnon
3 years agoMagicSanj
3 years agoG::Wadstrand
3 years agoRXillusionist
3 years agoMagicSanj
3 years agoDJDonkeyPuncher
3 years agoTenkai
3 years agoIzzy
3 years agoJ:G
3 years agoPTG
3 years agoPTG
3 years agoDecksterity
3 years agovipercard
3 years agovisualartist
3 years agoHolyshnikes
3 years agoDJDonkeyPuncher
3 years agospades
3 years agoHolyshnikes
3 years agoAmpersan5340
3 years agoj.bayme
3 years agocardmasterseth
3 years agoAmpersan5340
3 years agoTheBlack&WhiteIllusionist
3 years agoJeremy C.
3 years agocdwonderist
3 years agoGianni
3 years agoFrankAb
3 years agoThecardster7
3 years agoHolyshnikes
3 years agoTheBlack&WhiteIllusionist
3 years agoEvgeny_Pluzhnikov
3 years agoLobato
2 years ago